Demographics details for Watkins glen, NY vs Auburn, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Watkins glen, NY vs Auburn, AL.
| Data | Watkins glen | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,809 | 80,006 |
| Median Age | 48.4 years | 25.9 years |
| Median Income | $44,542 | $55,509 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Watkins glen vs Auburn
- The population in Auburn is higher at 80,006, compared to 1,809 in Watkins glen.
- Residents in Watkins glen have a higher median age of 48.4 years compared to 25.9 years in Auburn.
- Auburn has a higher median income of $55,509, compared to $44,542 in Watkins glen.
- In Auburn, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 31.0% in Watkins glen.
- The poverty level is identical in both Watkins glen and Auburn at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Watkins glen is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.0% in Auburn.
Demographics
Demographics Watkins glen vs Auburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Watkins glen | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 17 |
| White | 90 | 69 |
| Asian | 5 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Watkins glen vs Auburn
- In Auburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 3% in Watkins glen.
- Watkins glen has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 69% in Auburn.
- In Auburn, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 5% in Watkins glen.
- Auburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Watkins glen.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Auburn at 3%, compared to 1% in Watkins glen.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Watkins glen and Auburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Watkins glen | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 21.1% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 35.3% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Watkins glen vs Auburn
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Watkins glen and Auburn at 17.6%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Watkins glen at 25.5% compared to 22.0% in Auburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Watkins glen at 21.1% compared to 15.5% in Auburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Watkins glen at 19.3% compared to 14.5% in Auburn.
- Auburn has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 35.3% in Watkins glen.
- Disability percentages are higher in Watkins glen at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Auburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Watkins glen | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.4% (61) | 0.3% (236) |
| High School Diploma | 16.4% (296) | 5.3% (4,206) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (244) | 2.5% (1,964) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.1% (382) | 30.7% (24,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Watkins glen vs Auburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Watkins glen have no formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 0.3% in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Watkins glen hold a high school diploma at 16.4% compared to 5.3% in Auburn.
- More residents in Watkins glen have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 2.5% in Auburn.
- In Auburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 21.1% in Watkins glen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.