Demographics details for Waterloo, IN vs Washington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterloo, IN vs Washington, NC.
| Data | Waterloo | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,136 | 10,828 |
| Median Age | 32.8 years | 48.0 years |
| Median Income | $59,519 | $38,927 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Waterloo vs Washington
- The population in Washington is higher at 10,828, compared to 2,136 in Waterloo.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 32.8 years in Waterloo.
- Waterloo has a higher median income of $59,519 compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Waterloo at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 16%, compared to 7% in Waterloo.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.5% in Waterloo.
Demographics
Demographics Waterloo vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waterloo | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 49 |
| White | 88 | 41 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Waterloo vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 0% in Waterloo.
- Waterloo has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 41% in Washington.
- The Asian population is larger in Waterloo at 1% compared to 0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Waterloo.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waterloo at 7% compared to 3% in Washington.
- In Washington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Waterloo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waterloo | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 27.9% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 21.0% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterloo vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.7% in Waterloo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Waterloo at 27.9% compared to 22.8% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 21.0% in Waterloo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waterloo at 18.1% compared to 14.7% in Washington.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 37.6% in Waterloo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 24.0% compared to 19.0% in Waterloo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waterloo | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (15) | 1.2% (128) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (381) | 19.0% (2,058) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (311) | 13.7% (1,487) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.1% (151) | 10.3% (1,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterloo vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Waterloo.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 17.8% in Waterloo.
- More residents in Waterloo have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 13.7% in Washington.
- In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 7.1% in Waterloo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.