Demographics details for Water valley, MS vs Little rock, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Water valley, MS vs Little rock, AR.

Data Water valley Little rock
Population 3,361 202,864
Median Age 35.8 years 36.6 years
Median Income $45,718 $58,697
Married Families 27.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 3.7

Population Comparison: Water valley vs Little rock

  • The population in Little rock is higher at 202,864, compared to 3,361 in Water valley.
  • The median age in Little rock is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 35.8 years in Water valley.
  • Little rock has a higher median income of $58,697, compared to $45,718 in Water valley.
  • In Little rock, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Little rock at 14%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Water valley is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.7% in Little rock.

Demographics

Demographics Water valley vs Little rock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Water valley Little rock
Black 49 41
White 49 44
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 2 8
Two or More Races Data is updating 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Water valley vs Little rock

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Water valley at 49% compared to 41% in Little rock.
  • Water valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 44% in Little rock.
  • In Little rock, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Water valley.
  • Little rock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 2% in Water valley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Little rock at 4%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Water valley and Little rock at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Water valley Little rock
Mental Health Not Good 18.2% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 13.8% 12.0%
Depression 22.0% 21.9%
Smoking 23.1% 19.0%
Binge Drinking 12.9% 12.9%
Obesity 44.0% 39.0%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Water valley vs Little rock

  • More residents in Water valley report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.9% in Little rock.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Water valley at 22.0% compared to 21.9% in Little rock.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Water valley at 23.1% compared to 19.0% in Little rock.
  • Binge drinking rates are similar in both Water valley and Little rock at 12.9%.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Water valley at 44.0% compared to 39.0% in Little rock.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Water valley at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Little rock.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Water valley Little rock
No Schooling 1.0% (34) 0.7% (1,359)
High School Diploma 24.0% (805) 12.2% (24,667)
Less than High School 13.0% (437) 7.3% (14,766)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.6% (322) 29.4% (59,641)

Education Levels Comparison: Water valley vs Little rock

  • A higher percentage of residents in Water valley have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.7% in Little rock.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Water valley hold a high school diploma at 24.0% compared to 12.2% in Little rock.
  • More residents in Water valley have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 7.3% in Little rock.
  • In Little rock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 9.6% in Water valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.