Demographics details for Washington, NC vs San ramon, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, NC vs San ramon, CA.
Data | Washington | San ramon |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,828 | 85,953 |
Median Age | 48.0 years | 40.5 years |
Median Income | $38,927 | $190,829 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 3% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs San ramon
- The population in San ramon is higher at 85,953, compared to 10,828 in Washington.
- Residents in Washington have a higher median age of 48.0 years compared to 40.5 years in San ramon.
- San ramon has a higher median income of $190,829, compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- In San ramon, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 34.0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 3% in San ramon.
- The unemployment rate in Washington is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.3% in San ramon.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs San ramon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Washington | San ramon |
---|---|---|
Black | 49 | 3 |
White | 41 | 33 |
Asian | Data is updating | 48 |
Hispanic | 6 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs San ramon
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Washington at 49% compared to 3% in San ramon.
- Washington has a higher percentage of White residents at 41% compared to 33% in San ramon.
- In San ramon, the Asian population stands at 48%, greater than 0% in Washington.
- San ramon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 6% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San ramon at 8%, compared to 3% in Washington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Washington at 1% compared to 0% in San ramon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Washington | San ramon |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 11.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 6.7% |
Depression | 22.8% | 14.9% |
Smoking | 21.9% | 6.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 43.3% | 18.9% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs San ramon
- More residents in Washington report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 11.6% in San ramon.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 22.8% compared to 14.9% in San ramon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Washington at 21.9% compared to 6.3% in San ramon.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in San ramon at 16.3% compared to 14.7% in Washington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Washington at 43.3% compared to 18.9% in San ramon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 24.0% compared to 6.0% in San ramon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Washington | San ramon |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (128) | 0.7% (596) |
High School Diploma | 19.0% (2,058) | 5.2% (4,459) |
Less than High School | 13.7% (1,487) | 3.2% (2,726) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.3% (1,118) | 46.6% (40,044) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs San ramon
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in San ramon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 5.2% in San ramon.
- More residents in Washington have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 3.2% in San ramon.
- In San ramon, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.6% compared to 10.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.