Demographics details for Wappingers falls, NY vs Gallatin, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Wappingers falls, NY vs Gallatin, TN.

Data Wappingers falls Gallatin
Population 6,064 48,194
Median Age 47.9 years 37.8 years
Median Income $61,554 $68,548
Married Families 32.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 5% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.3

Population Comparison: Wappingers falls vs Gallatin

  • The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 6,064 in Wappingers falls.
  • Residents in Wappingers falls have a higher median age of 47.9 years compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
  • Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548, compared to $61,554 in Wappingers falls.
  • In Gallatin, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Wappingers falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 5% in Wappingers falls.
  • The unemployment rate in Wappingers falls is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.

Demographics

Demographics Wappingers falls vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Wappingers falls Gallatin
Black 13 15
White 61 67
Asian 3 2
Hispanic 20 9
Two or More Races 3 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Wappingers falls vs Gallatin

  • In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 13% in Wappingers falls.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Gallatin at 67% compared to 61% in Wappingers falls.
  • The Asian population is larger in Wappingers falls at 3% compared to 2% in Gallatin.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Wappingers falls at 20% compared to 9% in Gallatin.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 3% in Wappingers falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wappingers falls and Gallatin at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Wappingers falls Gallatin
Mental Health Not Good 16.5% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 13.2%
Depression 22.8% 27.7%
Smoking 20.1% 20.8%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 14.7%
Obesity 34.7% 37.2%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Wappingers falls vs Gallatin

  • In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.5% in Wappingers falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 22.8% in Wappingers falls.
  • Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 20.1% in Wappingers falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Wappingers falls at 16.4% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
  • Gallatin has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 34.7% in Wappingers falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Wappingers falls at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Wappingers falls Gallatin
No Schooling 0.9% (57) 1.2% (596)
High School Diploma 18.1% (1,099) 13.9% (6,695)
Less than High School 24.9% (1,511) 11.6% (5,600)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.2% (861) 19.6% (9,464)

Education Levels Comparison: Wappingers falls vs Gallatin

  • In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Wappingers falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wappingers falls hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
  • More residents in Wappingers falls have less than a high school education at 24.9% compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
  • In Gallatin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 14.2% in Wappingers falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.