Demographics details for Wallingford, IA vs Jeffersonville, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Wallingford, IA vs Jeffersonville, IN.

Data Wallingford Jeffersonville
Population 153 51,030
Median Age 42.7 years 38.6 years
Median Income $62,250 $67,566
Married Families 48.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 8% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.1

Population Comparison: Wallingford vs Jeffersonville

  • The population in Jeffersonville is higher at 51,030, compared to 153 in Wallingford.
  • Residents in Wallingford have a higher median age of 42.7 years compared to 38.6 years in Jeffersonville.
  • Jeffersonville has a higher median income of $67,566, compared to $62,250 in Wallingford.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Wallingford at 48.0% compared to 37.0% in Jeffersonville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Jeffersonville at 10%, compared to 8% in Wallingford.
  • Jeffersonville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.2% in Wallingford.

Demographics

Demographics Wallingford vs Jeffersonville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Wallingford Jeffersonville
Black Data is updating 12
White 84 75
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 16 5
Two or More Races Data is updating 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Wallingford vs Jeffersonville

  • In Jeffersonville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 0% in Wallingford.
  • Wallingford has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 75% in Jeffersonville.
  • In Jeffersonville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Wallingford.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Wallingford at 16% compared to 5% in Jeffersonville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jeffersonville at 7%, compared to 0% in Wallingford.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wallingford and Jeffersonville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Wallingford Jeffersonville
Mental Health Not Good 15.6% 17.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.4% 11.7%
Depression 19.9% 23.5%
Smoking 17.5% 20.2%
Binge Drinking 22.2% 16.9%
Obesity 37.6% 40.2%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Wallingford vs Jeffersonville

  • In Jeffersonville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.6% in Wallingford.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Jeffersonville at 23.5% versus 19.9% in Wallingford.
  • Jeffersonville has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 17.5% in Wallingford.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Wallingford at 22.2% compared to 16.9% in Jeffersonville.
  • Jeffersonville has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 37.6% in Wallingford.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Wallingford at 23.0% compared to 13.0% in Jeffersonville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Wallingford Jeffersonville
No Schooling 3.3% (5) 0.6% (293)
High School Diploma 29.4% (45) 18.6% (9,472)
Less than High School 13.1% (20) 9.7% (4,952)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.5% (13) 16.9% (8,649)

Education Levels Comparison: Wallingford vs Jeffersonville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Wallingford have no formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.6% in Jeffersonville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wallingford hold a high school diploma at 29.4% compared to 18.6% in Jeffersonville.
  • More residents in Wallingford have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 9.7% in Jeffersonville.
  • In Jeffersonville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 8.5% in Wallingford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.