Demographics details for Walkerville, MI vs Yuma, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Walkerville, MI vs Yuma, AZ.
Data | Walkerville | Yuma |
---|---|---|
Population | 267 | 98,527 |
Median Age | 37.1 years | 32.0 years |
Median Income | $31,625 | $59,312 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 9.0 |
Population Comparison: Walkerville vs Yuma
- The population in Yuma is higher at 98,527, compared to 267 in Walkerville.
- Residents in Walkerville have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 32.0 years in Yuma.
- Yuma has a higher median income of $59,312, compared to $31,625 in Walkerville.
- In Yuma, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 27.0% in Walkerville.
- The poverty level is higher in Yuma at 18%, compared to 13% in Walkerville.
- Yuma has a higher unemployment rate at 9.0% compared to 3.2% in Walkerville.
Demographics
Demographics Walkerville vs Yuma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Walkerville | Yuma |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 86 | 13 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 10 | 61 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 21 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Walkerville vs Yuma
- In Yuma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Walkerville.
- Walkerville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 13% in Yuma.
- In Yuma, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Walkerville.
- Yuma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 61%, compared to 10% in Walkerville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yuma at 21%, compared to 3% in Walkerville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Walkerville and Yuma at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Walkerville | Yuma |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 13.2% |
Depression | 26.9% | 19.3% |
Smoking | 25.1% | 16.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 39.0% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Walkerville vs Yuma
- More residents in Walkerville report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 16.8% in Yuma.
- Depression is more prevalent in Walkerville at 26.9% compared to 19.3% in Yuma.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Walkerville at 25.1% compared to 16.2% in Yuma.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Yuma at 17.6% compared to 16.3% in Walkerville.
- Yuma has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 39.0% in Walkerville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Walkerville at 27.0% compared to 12.0% in Yuma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Walkerville | Yuma |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (2) | 1.7% (1,642) |
High School Diploma | 20.6% (55) | 13.2% (13,054) |
Less than High School | 7.5% (20) | 19.8% (19,520) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 1.9% (5) | 12.3% (12,116) |
Education Levels Comparison: Walkerville vs Yuma
- In Yuma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.7% in Walkerville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Walkerville hold a high school diploma at 20.6% compared to 13.2% in Yuma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yuma at 19.8%, compared to 7.5% in Walkerville.
- In Yuma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 1.9% in Walkerville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.