Demographics details for Waite park, MN vs Toccoa, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waite park, MN vs Toccoa, GA.
| Data | Waite park | Toccoa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,366 | 9,146 |
| Median Age | 40.7 years | 42.3 years |
| Median Income | $52,391 | $49,860 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Waite park vs Toccoa
- The population in Toccoa is higher at 9,146, compared to 8,366 in Waite park.
- The median age in Toccoa is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 40.7 years in Waite park.
- Waite park has a higher median income of $52,391 compared to $49,860 in Toccoa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Waite park at 42.0% compared to 31.0% in Toccoa.
- The poverty level is higher in Toccoa at 17%, compared to 9% in Waite park.
- Toccoa has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.2% in Waite park.
Demographics
Demographics Waite park vs Toccoa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waite park | Toccoa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 31 | 19 |
| White | 57 | 74 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waite park vs Toccoa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waite park at 31% compared to 19% in Toccoa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Toccoa at 74% compared to 57% in Waite park.
- Both Waite park and Toccoa have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waite park at 7% compared to 1% in Toccoa.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Toccoa at 4%, compared to 3% in Waite park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waite park and Toccoa at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waite park | Toccoa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 43.1% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waite park vs Toccoa
- In Toccoa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.3% in Waite park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Waite park at 25.5% compared to 22.6% in Toccoa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Waite park at 21.5% compared to 19.9% in Toccoa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waite park at 20.0% compared to 15.5% in Toccoa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Waite park at 43.1% compared to 34.9% in Toccoa.
- Disability percentages are higher in Waite park at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Toccoa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waite park | Toccoa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.7% (397) | 2.7% (244) |
| High School Diploma | 20.8% (1,744) | 25.0% (2,284) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (1,142) | 20.6% (1,887) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (970) | 11.9% (1,090) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waite park vs Toccoa
- A higher percentage of residents in Waite park have no formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 2.7% in Toccoa.
- In Toccoa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 20.8% in Waite park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Toccoa at 20.6%, compared to 13.7% in Waite park.
- In Toccoa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 11.6% in Waite park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.