Demographics details for Volcano, HI vs Sulphur, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Volcano, HI vs Sulphur, OK.
| Data | Volcano | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 608 | 4,951 |
| Median Age | 66.7 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $81,875 | $55,951 |
| Married Families | 79.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | Data is updating | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Volcano vs Sulphur
- The population in Sulphur is higher at 4,951, compared to 608 in Volcano.
- Residents in Volcano have a higher median age of 66.7 years compared to 38.8 years in Sulphur.
- Volcano has a higher median income of $81,875 compared to $55,951 in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Volcano at 79.0% compared to 34.0% in Sulphur.
- The poverty level is higher in Sulphur at 14%, compared to 0% in Volcano.
- Sulphur has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 0.0% in Volcano.
Demographics
Demographics Volcano vs Sulphur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Volcano | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 65 | 60 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 13 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 10 |
Demographics Comparison: Volcano vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Volcano.
- Volcano has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 60% in Sulphur.
- The Asian population is larger in Volcano at 6% compared to 0% in Sulphur.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Volcano at 13% compared to 12% in Sulphur.
- Both Volcano and Sulphur have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 16%.
- In Sulphur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 10%, compared to 0% in Volcano.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Volcano | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Volcano vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.5% in Volcano.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sulphur at 25.3% versus 19.9% in Volcano.
- Sulphur has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 16.6% in Volcano.
- Binge drinking is more common in Volcano at 21.0% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 30.1% in Volcano.
- Disability percentages are higher in Volcano at 28.0% compared to 19.0% in Sulphur.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Volcano | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.8% (88) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (105) | 18.2% (899) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 18.1% (898) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.1% (165) | 10.9% (542) |
Education Levels Comparison: Volcano vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Volcano.
- In Sulphur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 17.3% in Volcano.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur at 18.1%, compared to 0.0% in Volcano.
- A higher percentage of residents in Volcano hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 10.9% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.