Demographics details for Victorville, CA vs Fort valley, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Victorville, CA vs Fort valley, GA.
Data | Victorville | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
Population | 137,221 | 8,838 |
Median Age | 31.8 years | 30.6 years |
Median Income | $65,746 | $31,807 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 18.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 25% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Victorville vs Fort valley
- In Victorville, the population is higher at 137,221, compared to 8,838 in Fort valley.
- Residents in Victorville have a higher median age of 31.8 years compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
- Victorville has a higher median income of $65,746 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Victorville at 31.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 12% in Victorville.
- The unemployment rate in Victorville is higher at 7.5%, compared to 4.5% in Fort valley.
Demographics
Demographics Victorville vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Victorville | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 70 |
White | 4 | 18 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 54 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 19 | 4 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Victorville vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 17% in Victorville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort valley at 18% compared to 4% in Victorville.
- The Asian population is larger in Victorville at 4% compared to 0% in Fort valley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Victorville at 54% compared to 8% in Fort valley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Victorville at 19% compared to 4% in Fort valley.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Victorville at 2% compared to 0% in Fort valley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Victorville | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 15.5% |
Depression | 19.0% | 19.5% |
Smoking | 16.2% | 22.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 11.8% |
Obesity | 41.3% | 46.2% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Victorville vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.4% in Victorville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort valley at 19.5% versus 19.0% in Victorville.
- Fort valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 16.2% in Victorville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Victorville at 14.8% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 41.3% in Victorville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort valley at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Victorville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Victorville | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (2,334) | 3.0% (267) |
High School Diploma | 15.1% (20,711) | 13.9% (1,226) |
Less than High School | 24.1% (33,076) | 17.3% (1,527) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.6% (9,125) | 10.8% (954) |
Education Levels Comparison: Victorville vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.7% in Victorville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Victorville hold a high school diploma at 15.1% compared to 13.9% in Fort valley.
- More residents in Victorville have less than a high school education at 24.1% compared to 17.3% in Fort valley.
- In Fort valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.8% compared to 6.6% in Victorville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.