Demographics details for Viborg, SD vs Cameron, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Viborg, SD vs Cameron, TX.
Data | Viborg | Cameron |
---|---|---|
Population | 824 | 425,208 |
Median Age | 50.3 years | 32.0 years |
Median Income | $46,316 | $47,435 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Viborg vs Cameron
- The population in Cameron is higher at 425,208, compared to 824 in Viborg.
- Residents in Viborg have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 32.0 years in Cameron.
- Cameron has a higher median income of $47,435, compared to $46,316 in Viborg.
- In Cameron, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 31.0% in Viborg.
- The poverty level is higher in Cameron at 15%, compared to 12% in Viborg.
- Cameron has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 3.2% in Viborg.
Demographics
Demographics Viborg vs Cameron provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Viborg | Cameron |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 91 | 60 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 89 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 29 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Viborg vs Cameron
- In Cameron, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Viborg.
- Viborg has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 60% in Cameron.
- In Cameron, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Viborg.
- Cameron has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 89%, compared to 4% in Viborg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cameron at 29%, compared to 4% in Viborg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Viborg at 1% compared to 0% in Cameron.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Viborg | Cameron |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 14.6% |
Depression | 18.1% | 19.0% |
Smoking | 17.4% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | 20.1% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 35.2% | 44.6% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Viborg vs Cameron
- In Cameron, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 13.8% in Viborg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cameron at 19.0% versus 18.1% in Viborg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Viborg at 17.4% compared to 15.4% in Cameron.
- Binge drinking is more common in Viborg at 20.1% compared to 16.3% in Cameron.
- Cameron has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 35.2% in Viborg.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Viborg and Cameron at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Viborg | Cameron |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.8% (11,750) |
High School Diploma | 22.8% (188) | 12.6% (53,487) |
Less than High School | 14.2% (117) | 34.2% (145,250) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (120) | 11.5% (48,712) |
Education Levels Comparison: Viborg vs Cameron
- In Cameron, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in Viborg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Viborg hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 12.6% in Cameron.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cameron at 34.2%, compared to 14.2% in Viborg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Viborg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 11.5% in Cameron.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.