Demographics details for Vancouver, WA vs Fort smith, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vancouver, WA vs Fort smith, AR.
| Data | Vancouver | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 194,512 | 89,992 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $73,626 | $50,799 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Vancouver vs Fort smith
- In Vancouver, the population is higher at 194,512, compared to 89,992 in Fort smith.
- Residents in Vancouver have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 36.4 years in Fort smith.
- Vancouver has a higher median income of $73,626 compared to $50,799 in Fort smith.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Vancouver and Fort smith at 36.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort smith at 12%, compared to 10% in Vancouver.
- The unemployment rate in Vancouver is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.7% in Fort smith.
Demographics
Demographics Vancouver vs Fort smith provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Vancouver | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 8 |
| White | 65 | 57 |
| Asian | 5 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Vancouver vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 3% in Vancouver.
- Vancouver has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 57% in Fort smith.
- In Fort smith, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 5% in Vancouver.
- Fort smith has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 15% in Vancouver.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Vancouver at 11% compared to 9% in Fort smith.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Vancouver and Fort smith at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Vancouver | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 14.5% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 13.2% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vancouver vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 17.5% in Vancouver.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort smith at 27.8% versus 25.7% in Vancouver.
- Fort smith has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 14.5% in Vancouver.
- Binge drinking is more common in Vancouver at 17.7% compared to 13.2% in Fort smith.
- Fort smith has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 33.1% in Vancouver.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort smith at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Vancouver.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Vancouver | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (1,478) | 2.3% (2,029) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (26,995) | 14.8% (13,356) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (20,890) | 19.8% (17,822) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (41,308) | 16.4% (14,745) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vancouver vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.8% in Vancouver.
- In Fort smith, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.8% compared to 13.9% in Vancouver.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort smith at 19.8%, compared to 10.7% in Vancouver.
- A higher percentage of residents in Vancouver hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 16.4% in Fort smith.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.