Demographics details for Van, TX vs Caruthersville, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Van, TX vs Caruthersville, MO.
| Data | Van | Caruthersville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,816 | 5,295 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $61,506 | $35,585 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Van vs Caruthersville
- The population in Caruthersville is higher at 5,295, compared to 2,816 in Van.
- The median age in Caruthersville is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 32.6 years in Van.
- Van has a higher median income of $61,506 compared to $35,585 in Caruthersville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Van at 41.0% compared to 26.0% in Caruthersville.
- The poverty level is higher in Caruthersville at 20%, compared to 12% in Van.
- Caruthersville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.5% in Van.
Demographics
Demographics Van vs Caruthersville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Van | Caruthersville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 40 |
| White | 77 | 52 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 14 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Van vs Caruthersville
- In Caruthersville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 4% in Van.
- Van has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 52% in Caruthersville.
- Both Van and Caruthersville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Van at 14% compared to 5% in Caruthersville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Van at 5% compared to 3% in Caruthersville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Van and Caruthersville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Van | Caruthersville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 17.0% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 28.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Van vs Caruthersville
- In Caruthersville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 19.2% in Van.
- Depression is more prevalent in Van at 26.2% compared to 25.6% in Caruthersville.
- Caruthersville has a higher smoking rate at 28.4% compared to 19.6% in Van.
- Binge drinking is more common in Van at 18.5% compared to 14.6% in Caruthersville.
- Caruthersville has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 36.2% in Van.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Caruthersville at 27.0% compared to 12.0% in Van.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Van | Caruthersville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (27) | 0.8% (42) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (377) | 23.6% (1,249) |
| Less than High School | 13.4% (378) | 23.0% (1,217) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (443) | 9.1% (484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Van vs Caruthersville
- A higher percentage of residents in Van have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Caruthersville.
- In Caruthersville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.6% compared to 13.4% in Van.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Caruthersville at 23.0%, compared to 13.4% in Van.
- A higher percentage of residents in Van hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 9.1% in Caruthersville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.