Demographics details for Van buren, ME vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Van buren, ME vs Gallatin, TN.
Data | Van buren | Gallatin |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,993 | 48,194 |
Median Age | 42.0 years | 37.8 years |
Median Income | $50,000 | $68,548 |
Married Families | 56.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Van buren vs Gallatin
- The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 1,993 in Van buren.
- Residents in Van buren have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548, compared to $50,000 in Van buren.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Van buren at 56.0% compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 12% in Van buren.
- The unemployment rate in Van buren is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Van buren vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Van buren | Gallatin |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 15 |
White | 95 | 67 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 1 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Van buren vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 1% in Van buren.
- Van buren has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- Both Van buren and Gallatin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 1% in Van buren.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 1% in Van buren.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Van buren and Gallatin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Van buren | Gallatin |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 13.2% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 27.7% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 20.8% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 14.7% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 37.2% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Van buren vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Van buren.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 0.0% in Van buren.
- Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Van buren.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gallatin at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Van buren.
- Gallatin has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 0.0% in Van buren.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gallatin at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Van buren.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Van buren | Gallatin |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (596) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 13.9% (6,695) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 11.6% (5,600) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Van buren vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Van buren.
- In Gallatin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Van buren.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallatin at 11.6%, compared to 0.0% in Van buren.
- In Gallatin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Van buren.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.