Demographics details for Valdosta, GA vs Chickasha, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Valdosta, GA vs Chickasha, OK.
Data | Valdosta | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
Population | 55,074 | 16,549 |
Median Age | 29.2 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $41,365 | $55,136 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Valdosta vs Chickasha
- In Valdosta, the population is higher at 55,074, compared to 16,549 in Chickasha.
- The median age in Chickasha is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 29.2 years in Valdosta.
- Chickasha has a higher median income of $55,136, compared to $41,365 in Valdosta.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 25.0% in Valdosta.
- Valdosta has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 17% in Chickasha.
- The unemployment rate in Valdosta is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Valdosta vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Valdosta | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
Black | 56 | 6 |
White | 34 | 71 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Valdosta vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Valdosta at 56% compared to 6% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chickasha at 71% compared to 34% in Valdosta.
- The Asian population is larger in Valdosta at 1% compared to 0% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Valdosta.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chickasha at 11%, compared to 4% in Valdosta.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Valdosta.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Valdosta | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.4% | 13.7% |
Depression | 22.2% | 25.4% |
Smoking | 23.1% | 21.8% |
Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 43.5% | 40.8% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Valdosta vs Chickasha
- More residents in Valdosta report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 19.1% in Chickasha.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 22.2% in Valdosta.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Valdosta at 23.1% compared to 21.8% in Chickasha.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chickasha at 13.8% compared to 13.0% in Valdosta.
- Obesity rates are higher in Valdosta at 43.5% compared to 40.8% in Chickasha.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Valdosta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Valdosta | Chickasha |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (538) | 0.5% (78) |
High School Diploma | 16.3% (8,967) | 22.5% (3,730) |
Less than High School | 8.9% (4,906) | 13.1% (2,160) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (8,750) | 12.5% (2,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Valdosta vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of residents in Valdosta have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 16.3% in Valdosta.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chickasha at 13.1%, compared to 8.9% in Valdosta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Valdosta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.