Demographics details for Upper darby, PA vs Garland, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Upper darby, PA vs Garland, TX.
Data | Upper darby | Garland |
---|---|---|
Population | 85,217 | 240,854 |
Median Age | 35.7 years | 34.4 years |
Median Income | $67,579 | $71,044 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Upper darby vs Garland
- The population in Garland is higher at 240,854, compared to 85,217 in Upper darby.
- Residents in Upper darby have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 34.4 years in Garland.
- Garland has a higher median income of $71,044, compared to $67,579 in Upper darby.
- In Garland, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 34.0% in Upper darby.
- The poverty level is higher in Garland at 12%, compared to 9% in Upper darby.
- The unemployment rate in Upper darby is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.0% in Garland.
Demographics
Demographics Upper darby vs Garland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Upper darby | Garland |
---|---|---|
Black | 34 | 16 |
White | 39 | 6 |
Asian | 12 | 11 |
Hispanic | 9 | 45 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 21 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Upper darby vs Garland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Upper darby at 34% compared to 16% in Garland.
- Upper darby has a higher percentage of White residents at 39% compared to 6% in Garland.
- The Asian population is larger in Upper darby at 12% compared to 11% in Garland.
- Garland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 45%, compared to 9% in Upper darby.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Garland at 21%, compared to 6% in Upper darby.
- In Garland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Upper darby.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Upper darby | Garland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.1% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 22.2% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 17.2% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 17.6% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 33.9% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Upper darby vs Garland
- In Garland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Garland at 22.2% versus 0.0% in Upper darby.
- Garland has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Garland at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
- Garland has higher obesity rates at 33.9% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
- Disability percentages are higher in Upper darby at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Garland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Upper darby | Garland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (1,162) | 2.5% (6,080) |
High School Diploma | 17.6% (14,973) | 13.9% (33,524) |
Less than High School | 10.3% (8,806) | 24.7% (59,406) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.2% (18,927) | 15.5% (37,249) |
Education Levels Comparison: Upper darby vs Garland
- In Garland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.4% in Upper darby.
- A higher percentage of residents in Upper darby hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 13.9% in Garland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Garland at 24.7%, compared to 10.3% in Upper darby.
- A higher percentage of residents in Upper darby hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.2% compared to 15.5% in Garland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.