Demographics details for Universal, IN vs Petaluma, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Universal, IN vs Petaluma, CA.
| Data | Universal | Petaluma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 283 | 58,652 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 43.5 years |
| Median Income | $55,000 | $108,527 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Universal vs Petaluma
- The population in Petaluma is higher at 58,652, compared to 283 in Universal.
- The median age in Petaluma is higher at 43.5 years, compared to 40.6 years in Universal.
- Petaluma has a higher median income of $108,527, compared to $55,000 in Universal.
- In Petaluma, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 31.0% in Universal.
- Universal has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Petaluma.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Universal and Petaluma at 3.6%.
Demographics
Demographics Universal vs Petaluma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Universal | Petaluma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 97 | 62 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Universal vs Petaluma
- In Petaluma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Universal.
- Universal has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 62% in Petaluma.
- In Petaluma, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Universal.
- Petaluma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 0% in Universal.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Petaluma at 11%, compared to 3% in Universal.
- In Petaluma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Universal.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Universal | Petaluma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 10.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 27.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Universal vs Petaluma
- More residents in Universal report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.1% in Petaluma.
- Depression is more prevalent in Universal at 26.6% compared to 20.1% in Petaluma.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Universal at 17.1% compared to 10.5% in Petaluma.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Petaluma at 20.4% compared to 18.6% in Universal.
- Obesity rates are higher in Universal at 37.4% compared to 27.5% in Petaluma.
- Disability percentages are higher in Universal at 31.0% compared to 10.0% in Petaluma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Universal | Petaluma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (558) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (53) | 11.0% (6,434) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (32) | 11.1% (6,496) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (32) | 32.4% (18,996) |
Education Levels Comparison: Universal vs Petaluma
- In Petaluma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Universal.
- A higher percentage of residents in Universal hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 11.0% in Petaluma.
- More residents in Universal have less than a high school education at 11.3% compared to 11.1% in Petaluma.
- In Petaluma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.4% compared to 11.3% in Universal.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.