Demographics details for Universal, IN vs Massapequa park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Universal, IN vs Massapequa park, NY.

Data Universal Massapequa park
Population 283 16,873
Median Age 40.6 years 43.7 years
Median Income $55,000 $161,193
Married Families 31.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 9% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.6 3.5

Population Comparison: Universal vs Massapequa park

  • The population in Massapequa park is higher at 16,873, compared to 283 in Universal.
  • The median age in Massapequa park is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 40.6 years in Universal.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193, compared to $55,000 in Universal.
  • In Massapequa park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 31.0% in Universal.
  • Universal has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • The unemployment rate in Universal is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.

Demographics

Demographics Universal vs Massapequa park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Universal Massapequa park
Black Data is updating 1
White 97 88
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic Data is updating 5
Two or More Races 3 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Universal vs Massapequa park

  • In Massapequa park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Universal.
  • Universal has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 88% in Massapequa park.
  • In Massapequa park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Universal.
  • Massapequa park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Universal.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Massapequa park at 4%, compared to 3% in Universal.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Universal and Massapequa park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Universal Massapequa park
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 8.0%
Depression 26.6% 17.9%
Smoking 17.1% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 18.6% 19.2%
Obesity 37.4% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 31.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Universal vs Massapequa park

  • More residents in Universal report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Universal at 26.6% compared to 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Universal at 17.1% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 18.6% in Universal.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Universal at 37.4% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Universal at 31.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Universal Massapequa park
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.3% (45)
High School Diploma 18.7% (53) 15.3% (2,586)
Less than High School 11.3% (32) 3.8% (641)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.3% (32) 36.6% (6,183)

Education Levels Comparison: Universal vs Massapequa park

  • In Massapequa park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Universal.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Universal hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents in Universal have less than a high school education at 11.3% compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • In Massapequa park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 11.3% in Universal.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.