Demographics details for Union, NJ vs Mendenhall, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union, NJ vs Mendenhall, MS.
| Data | Union | Mendenhall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 59,956 | 2,148 |
| Median Age | 41.9 years | 39.0 years |
| Median Income | $113,528 | $35,956 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Union vs Mendenhall
- In Union, the population is higher at 59,956, compared to 2,148 in Mendenhall.
- Residents in Union have a higher median age of 41.9 years compared to 39.0 years in Mendenhall.
- Union has a higher median income of $113,528 compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Union at 43.0% compared to 31.0% in Mendenhall.
- The poverty level is higher in Mendenhall at 20%, compared to 6% in Union.
- Mendenhall has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 4.5% in Union.
Demographics
Demographics Union vs Mendenhall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Union | Mendenhall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 36 | 65 |
| White | 27 | 34 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Union vs Mendenhall
- In Mendenhall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 65% compared to 36% in Union.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mendenhall at 34% compared to 27% in Union.
- The Asian population is larger in Union at 11% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Union at 18% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Union at 8% compared to 1% in Mendenhall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union and Mendenhall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Union | Mendenhall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.6% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 24.5% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 46.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union vs Mendenhall
- In Mendenhall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Union.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mendenhall at 24.8% versus 0.0% in Union.
- Mendenhall has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 0.0% in Union.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mendenhall at 13.7% compared to 0.0% in Union.
- Mendenhall has higher obesity rates at 46.3% compared to 0.0% in Union.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 9.0% in Union.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Union | Mendenhall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (990) | 0.7% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (9,765) | 17.9% (385) |
| Less than High School | 12.2% (7,318) | 20.7% (445) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.3% (17,542) | 18.4% (395) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union vs Mendenhall
- A higher percentage of residents in Union have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.7% in Mendenhall.
- In Mendenhall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 16.3% in Union.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mendenhall at 20.7%, compared to 12.2% in Union.
- A higher percentage of residents in Union hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.3% compared to 18.4% in Mendenhall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.