Demographics details for Union grove, AL vs Sioux falls, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Union grove, AL vs Sioux falls, SD.
| Data | Union grove | Sioux falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69 | 202,078 |
| Median Age | 52.9 years | 34.9 years |
| Median Income | $81,875 | $71,785 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Union grove vs Sioux falls
- The population in Sioux falls is higher at 202,078, compared to 69 in Union grove.
- Residents in Union grove have a higher median age of 52.9 years compared to 34.9 years in Sioux falls.
- Union grove has a higher median income of $81,875 compared to $71,785 in Sioux falls.
- In Sioux falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 28.0% in Union grove.
- The poverty level is higher in Sioux falls at 11%, compared to 7% in Union grove.
- The unemployment rate in Union grove is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.0% in Sioux falls.
Demographics
Demographics Union grove vs Sioux falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Union grove | Sioux falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 7 |
| White | 95 | 78 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Union grove vs Sioux falls
- In Sioux falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 1% in Union grove.
- Union grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 78% in Sioux falls.
- In Sioux falls, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Union grove.
- Sioux falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Union grove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sioux falls at 6%, compared to 1% in Union grove.
- In Sioux falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Union grove.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Union grove | Sioux falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 13.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 19.4% |
| Smoking | 15.7% | 16.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 21.6% |
| Obesity | 31.4% | 35.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 33.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Union grove vs Sioux falls
- More residents in Union grove report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 13.3% in Sioux falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Union grove at 22.6% compared to 19.4% in Sioux falls.
- Sioux falls has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 15.7% in Union grove.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sioux falls at 21.6% compared to 18.1% in Union grove.
- Sioux falls has higher obesity rates at 35.8% compared to 31.4% in Union grove.
- Disability percentages are higher in Union grove at 33.0% compared to 9.0% in Sioux falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Union grove | Sioux falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (1,619) |
| High School Diploma | 40.6% (28) | 13.1% (26,548) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 7.3% (14,743) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (8) | 23.3% (47,034) |
Education Levels Comparison: Union grove vs Sioux falls
- In Sioux falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Union grove hold a high school diploma at 40.6% compared to 13.1% in Sioux falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sioux falls at 7.3%, compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
- In Sioux falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.3% compared to 11.6% in Union grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.