Demographics details for Union grove, AL vs Cedar lake, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Union grove, AL vs Cedar lake, IN.

Data Union grove Cedar lake
Population 69 15,592
Median Age 52.9 years 39.5 years
Median Income $81,875 $84,444
Married Families 28.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 7% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Union grove vs Cedar lake

  • The population in Cedar lake is higher at 15,592, compared to 69 in Union grove.
  • Residents in Union grove have a higher median age of 52.9 years compared to 39.5 years in Cedar lake.
  • Cedar lake has a higher median income of $84,444, compared to $81,875 in Union grove.
  • In Cedar lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 28.0% in Union grove.
  • Union grove has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Union grove and Cedar lake at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Union grove vs Cedar lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Union grove Cedar lake
Black 1 Data is updating
White 95 94
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 3
Two or More Races 1 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Union grove vs Cedar lake

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Union grove at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
  • Union grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 94% in Cedar lake.
  • Both Union grove and Cedar lake have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Union grove and Cedar lake at 3%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar lake at 3%, compared to 1% in Union grove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Union grove and Cedar lake at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Union grove Cedar lake
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 11.1%
Depression 22.6% 25.4%
Smoking 15.7% 18.8%
Binge Drinking 18.1% 19.8%
Obesity 31.4% 37.2%
Disability Percentage 33.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Union grove vs Cedar lake

  • More residents in Union grove report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.6% in Cedar lake.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar lake at 25.4% versus 22.6% in Union grove.
  • Cedar lake has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 15.7% in Union grove.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 18.1% in Union grove.
  • Cedar lake has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 31.4% in Union grove.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Union grove at 33.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar lake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Union grove Cedar lake
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (67)
High School Diploma 40.6% (28) 21.1% (3,292)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.1% (1,102)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.6% (8) 14.1% (2,204)

Education Levels Comparison: Union grove vs Cedar lake

  • In Cedar lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Union grove hold a high school diploma at 40.6% compared to 21.1% in Cedar lake.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar lake at 7.1%, compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
  • In Cedar lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 11.6% in Union grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.