Demographics details for Tullahoma, TN vs Mukwonago, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tullahoma, TN vs Mukwonago, WI.
| Data | Tullahoma | Mukwonago |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,830 | 8,446 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $56,771 | $91,827 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Tullahoma vs Mukwonago
- In Tullahoma, the population is higher at 20,830, compared to 8,446 in Mukwonago.
- Residents in Tullahoma have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 39.7 years in Mukwonago.
- Mukwonago has a higher median income of $91,827, compared to $56,771 in Tullahoma.
- In Mukwonago, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 41.0% in Tullahoma.
- Tullahoma has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Mukwonago.
- The unemployment rate in Tullahoma is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Mukwonago.
Demographics
Demographics Tullahoma vs Mukwonago provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tullahoma | Mukwonago |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 83 | 82 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tullahoma vs Mukwonago
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tullahoma at 6% compared to 0% in Mukwonago.
- Tullahoma has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 82% in Mukwonago.
- In Mukwonago, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Tullahoma.
- Mukwonago has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Tullahoma.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mukwonago at 7%, compared to 4% in Tullahoma.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tullahoma and Mukwonago at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tullahoma | Mukwonago |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 28.9% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 22.6% | 13.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 25.2% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 35.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tullahoma vs Mukwonago
- More residents in Tullahoma report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 13.8% in Mukwonago.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tullahoma at 28.9% compared to 21.2% in Mukwonago.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tullahoma at 22.6% compared to 13.8% in Mukwonago.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mukwonago at 25.2% compared to 15.1% in Tullahoma.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tullahoma at 39.1% compared to 35.3% in Mukwonago.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tullahoma at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Mukwonago.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tullahoma | Mukwonago |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (117) | 0.6% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (3,932) | 17.0% (1,435) |
| Less than High School | 14.1% (2,944) | 4.7% (394) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (4,012) | 25.3% (2,138) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tullahoma vs Mukwonago
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Tullahoma and Mukwonago at 0.6%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tullahoma hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 17.0% in Mukwonago.
- More residents in Tullahoma have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 4.7% in Mukwonago.
- In Mukwonago, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 19.3% in Tullahoma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.