Demographics details for Trinity, TX vs Cedar falls, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Trinity, TX vs Cedar falls, IA.
Data | Trinity | Cedar falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,996 | 40,746 |
Median Age | 50.1 years | 28.0 years |
Median Income | $51,165 | $71,011 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Trinity vs Cedar falls
- The population in Cedar falls is higher at 40,746, compared to 13,996 in Trinity.
- Residents in Trinity have a higher median age of 50.1 years compared to 28.0 years in Cedar falls.
- Cedar falls has a higher median income of $71,011, compared to $51,165 in Trinity.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Trinity at 44.0% compared to 36.0% in Cedar falls.
- Trinity has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 8% in Cedar falls.
- The unemployment rate in Trinity is higher at 5.6%, compared to 2.9% in Cedar falls.
Demographics
Demographics Trinity vs Cedar falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Trinity | Cedar falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 1 |
White | 76 | 90 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 11 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Trinity vs Cedar falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Trinity at 8% compared to 1% in Cedar falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar falls at 90% compared to 76% in Trinity.
- In Cedar falls, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Trinity.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Trinity at 11% compared to 3% in Cedar falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Trinity at 5% compared to 2% in Cedar falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Trinity and Cedar falls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Trinity | Cedar falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 9.0% |
Depression | 26.4% | 19.8% |
Smoking | 21.2% | 14.9% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 22.2% |
Obesity | 39.2% | 34.8% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Trinity vs Cedar falls
- More residents in Trinity report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 15.5% in Cedar falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Trinity at 26.4% compared to 19.8% in Cedar falls.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Trinity at 21.2% compared to 14.9% in Cedar falls.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar falls at 22.2% compared to 17.9% in Trinity.
- Obesity rates are higher in Trinity at 39.2% compared to 34.8% in Cedar falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Trinity at 24.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Trinity | Cedar falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (70) | 0.1% (43) |
High School Diploma | 22.2% (3,102) | 9.6% (3,893) |
Less than High School | 18.1% (2,540) | 2.8% (1,147) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (1,481) | 26.8% (10,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Trinity vs Cedar falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Trinity have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Cedar falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Trinity hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 9.6% in Cedar falls.
- More residents in Trinity have less than a high school education at 18.1% compared to 2.8% in Cedar falls.
- In Cedar falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.8% compared to 10.6% in Trinity.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.