Demographics details for Trexlertown, PA vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Trexlertown, PA vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Trexlertown | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,885 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 34.6 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $93,472 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Trexlertown vs Gallatin
- The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 1,885 in Trexlertown.
- The median age in Gallatin is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 34.6 years in Trexlertown.
- Trexlertown has a higher median income of $93,472 compared to $68,548 in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Trexlertown at 50.0% compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 4% in Trexlertown.
- The unemployment rate in Trexlertown is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Trexlertown vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Trexlertown | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 15 |
| White | 65 | 67 |
| Asian | 11 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Trexlertown vs Gallatin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Trexlertown at 18% compared to 15% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gallatin at 67% compared to 65% in Trexlertown.
- The Asian population is larger in Trexlertown at 11% compared to 2% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 5% in Trexlertown.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 1% in Trexlertown.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Trexlertown and Gallatin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Trexlertown | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 12.3% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 3.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Trexlertown vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.5% in Trexlertown.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 19.9% in Trexlertown.
- Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 12.3% in Trexlertown.
- Binge drinking is more common in Trexlertown at 19.4% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 28.2% in Trexlertown.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gallatin at 11.0% compared to 3.0% in Trexlertown.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Trexlertown | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (347) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (76) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.2% (776) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Trexlertown vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Trexlertown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Trexlertown hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallatin at 11.6%, compared to 4.0% in Trexlertown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Trexlertown hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 19.6% in Gallatin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.