Demographics details for Tolar, TX vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tolar, TX vs Spanish fork, UT.
Data | Tolar | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,092 | 44,102 |
Median Age | 23.5 years | 27.4 years |
Median Income | $89,135 | $93,989 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Tolar vs Spanish fork
- The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 1,092 in Tolar.
- The median age in Spanish fork is higher at 27.4 years, compared to 23.5 years in Tolar.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $89,135 in Tolar.
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 40.0% in Tolar.
- The poverty level is identical in both Tolar and Spanish fork at 6%.
- Spanish fork has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.5% in Tolar.
Demographics
Demographics Tolar vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tolar | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 76 | 80 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tolar vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tolar at 3% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spanish fork at 80% compared to 76% in Tolar.
- The Asian population is larger in Tolar at 1% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Tolar and Spanish fork at 12%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tolar at 8% compared to 7% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tolar and Spanish fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tolar | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 10.8% |
Depression | 25.1% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 17.6% | 7.7% |
Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 8.3% |
Obesity | 33.3% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tolar vs Spanish fork
- More residents in Tolar report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tolar at 25.1% compared to 23.8% in Spanish fork.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tolar at 17.6% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tolar at 19.6% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tolar at 33.3% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tolar at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tolar | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (9) | 0.4% (175) |
High School Diploma | 8.4% (92) | 9.1% (4,010) |
Less than High School | 5.9% (64) | 5.9% (2,583) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (171) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tolar vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Tolar have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
- In Spanish fork, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.1% compared to 8.4% in Tolar.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 5.9%.
- In Spanish fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 15.7% in Tolar.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.