Demographics details for Tehachapi, CA vs Trinity, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tehachapi, CA vs Trinity, TX.
Data | Tehachapi | Trinity |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,389 | 13,996 |
Median Age | 38.3 years | 50.1 years |
Median Income | $62,788 | $51,165 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Tehachapi vs Trinity
- The population in Trinity is higher at 13,996, compared to 12,389 in Tehachapi.
- The median age in Trinity is higher at 50.1 years, compared to 38.3 years in Tehachapi.
- Tehachapi has a higher median income of $62,788 compared to $51,165 in Trinity.
- In Trinity, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 32.0% in Tehachapi.
- The poverty level is higher in Trinity at 17%, compared to 11% in Tehachapi.
- The unemployment rate in Tehachapi is higher at 6.5%, compared to 5.6% in Trinity.
Demographics
Demographics Tehachapi vs Trinity provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tehachapi | Trinity |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 8 |
White | 37 | 76 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 37 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 5 |
American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tehachapi vs Trinity
- In Trinity, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 7% in Tehachapi.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Trinity at 76% compared to 37% in Tehachapi.
- The Asian population is larger in Tehachapi at 3% compared to 0% in Trinity.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Tehachapi at 37% compared to 11% in Trinity.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tehachapi at 12% compared to 5% in Trinity.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Tehachapi at 4% compared to 0% in Trinity.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tehachapi | Trinity |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 19.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 13.7% |
Depression | 17.6% | 26.4% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 21.2% |
Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 35.2% | 39.2% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tehachapi vs Trinity
- In Trinity, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 16.0% in Tehachapi.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Trinity at 26.4% versus 17.6% in Tehachapi.
- Trinity has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 16.4% in Tehachapi.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tehachapi at 18.7% compared to 17.9% in Trinity.
- Trinity has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 35.2% in Tehachapi.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Trinity at 24.0% compared to 12.0% in Tehachapi.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tehachapi | Trinity |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (172) | 0.5% (70) |
High School Diploma | 13.3% (1,649) | 22.2% (3,102) |
Less than High School | 27.7% (3,437) | 18.1% (2,540) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (1,354) | 10.6% (1,481) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tehachapi vs Trinity
- A higher percentage of residents in Tehachapi have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Trinity.
- In Trinity, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 13.3% in Tehachapi.
- More residents in Tehachapi have less than a high school education at 27.7% compared to 18.1% in Trinity.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tehachapi hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 10.6% in Trinity.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.