Demographics details for Taylorsville, UT vs Union city, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, UT vs Union city, GA.
| Data | Taylorsville | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,879 | 27,895 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $81,417 | $46,696 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Union city
- In Taylorsville, the population is higher at 57,879, compared to 27,895 in Union city.
- Residents in Taylorsville have a higher median age of 33.7 years compared to 32.7 years in Union city.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417 compared to $46,696 in Union city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 17.0% in Union city.
- The poverty level is higher in Union city at 16%, compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.6% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylorsville | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 85 |
| White | 57 | 6 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Union city
- In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 85% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 6% in Union city.
- The Asian population is larger in Taylorsville at 7% compared to 0% in Union city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylorsville at 25% compared to 5% in Union city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Taylorsville at 9% compared to 4% in Union city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Taylorsville at 1% compared to 0% in Union city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylorsville | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 27.2% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 10.0% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 32.0% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Union city
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 16.7% in Union city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 27.2% compared to 17.2% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Taylorsville at 15.2% compared to 13.5% in Union city.
- Union city has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Taylorsville and Union city at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylorsville | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (721) | 0.5% (129) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (9,799) | 13.2% (3,681) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (8,775) | 7.8% (2,166) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (9,066) | 17.3% (4,828) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Union city
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 13.2% in Union city.
- More residents in Taylorsville have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 7.8% in Union city.
- In Union city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 15.7% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.