Demographics details for Taylorsville, UT vs Frankfort, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, UT vs Frankfort, KY.
| Data | Taylorsville | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,879 | 28,391 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 34.2 years |
| Median Income | $81,417 | $53,905 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Frankfort
- In Taylorsville, the population is higher at 57,879, compared to 28,391 in Frankfort.
- The median age in Frankfort is higher at 34.2 years, compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417 compared to $53,905 in Frankfort.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 31.0% in Frankfort.
- The poverty level is higher in Frankfort at 12%, compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- Frankfort has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.6% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Frankfort provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylorsville | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 12 |
| White | 57 | 71 |
| Asian | 7 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Frankfort
- In Frankfort, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Frankfort at 71% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
- The Asian population is larger in Taylorsville at 7% compared to 3% in Frankfort.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylorsville at 25% compared to 6% in Frankfort.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Taylorsville at 9% compared to 8% in Frankfort.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Taylorsville at 1% compared to 0% in Frankfort.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylorsville | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 27.2% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 10.0% | 19.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 32.0% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Frankfort
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 18.1% in Frankfort.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 27.2% compared to 26.4% in Frankfort.
- Frankfort has a higher smoking rate at 19.4% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Taylorsville at 15.2% compared to 14.5% in Frankfort.
- Frankfort has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Frankfort at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Taylorsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylorsville | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (721) | 0.3% (89) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (9,799) | 15.3% (4,339) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (8,775) | 11.5% (3,279) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (9,066) | 18.7% (5,295) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Frankfort
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Frankfort.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 15.3% in Frankfort.
- More residents in Taylorsville have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 11.5% in Frankfort.
- In Frankfort, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 15.7% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.