Demographics details for Taylorsville, UT vs Cleburne, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylorsville, UT vs Cleburne, TX.
| Data | Taylorsville | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 57,879 | 33,826 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $81,417 | $60,929 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Taylorsville vs Cleburne
- In Taylorsville, the population is higher at 57,879, compared to 33,826 in Cleburne.
- The median age in Cleburne is higher at 35.2 years, compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417 compared to $60,929 in Cleburne.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 39.0% in Cleburne.
- The poverty level is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- Cleburne has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.6% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Taylorsville vs Cleburne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylorsville | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 6 |
| White | 57 | 52 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- The Asian population is larger in Taylorsville at 7% compared to 1% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 25% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Taylorsville and Cleburne at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylorsville | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 27.2% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 10.0% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 32.0% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylorsville vs Cleburne
- More residents in Taylorsville report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 18.6% in Cleburne.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylorsville at 27.2% compared to 23.6% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cleburne at 17.9% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- Cleburne has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Taylorsville at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Cleburne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylorsville | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (721) | 1.4% (471) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (9,799) | 17.8% (6,005) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (8,775) | 17.8% (6,010) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (9,066) | 10.0% (3,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylorsville vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.2% in Taylorsville.
- In Cleburne, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleburne at 17.8%, compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylorsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.