Demographics details for Taylor, AR vs Zanesville, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Taylor, AR vs Zanesville, OH.
| Data | Taylor | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 563 | 24,600 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $47,500 | $40,927 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Taylor vs Zanesville
- The population in Zanesville is higher at 24,600, compared to 563 in Taylor.
- Residents in Taylor have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 38.1 years in Zanesville.
- Taylor has a higher median income of $47,500 compared to $40,927 in Zanesville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Taylor at 43.0% compared to 25.0% in Zanesville.
- Taylor has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 11% in Zanesville.
- Zanesville has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 3.2% in Taylor.
Demographics
Demographics Taylor vs Zanesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Taylor | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 9 |
| White | 90 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Taylor vs Zanesville
- In Zanesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Taylor.
- Taylor has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 79% in Zanesville.
- In Zanesville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Taylor.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Taylor at 4% compared to 3% in Zanesville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Zanesville at 8%, compared to 5% in Taylor.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Taylor and Zanesville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Taylor | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.1% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 26.7% |
| Smoking | 23.2% | 25.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 47.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Taylor vs Zanesville
- In Zanesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 20.1% in Taylor.
- Depression is more prevalent in Taylor at 27.7% compared to 26.7% in Zanesville.
- Zanesville has a higher smoking rate at 25.8% compared to 23.2% in Taylor.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Zanesville at 16.6% compared to 15.2% in Taylor.
- Zanesville has higher obesity rates at 47.8% compared to 37.1% in Taylor.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Zanesville at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Taylor.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Taylor | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (8) | 1.6% (389) |
| High School Diploma | 41.0% (231) | 26.5% (6,510) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (33) | 17.8% (4,373) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (64) | 9.0% (2,214) |
Education Levels Comparison: Taylor vs Zanesville
- In Zanesville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.4% in Taylor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylor hold a high school diploma at 41.0% compared to 26.5% in Zanesville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Zanesville at 17.8%, compared to 5.9% in Taylor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Taylor hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.4% compared to 9.0% in Zanesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.