Demographics details for Tacoma, WA vs Lawrence, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tacoma, WA vs Lawrence, KS.
Data | Tacoma | Lawrence |
---|---|---|
Population | 221,776 | 95,794 |
Median Age | 36.9 years | 28.8 years |
Median Income | $79,085 | $59,834 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Tacoma vs Lawrence
- In Tacoma, the population is higher at 221,776, compared to 95,794 in Lawrence.
- Residents in Tacoma have a higher median age of 36.9 years compared to 28.8 years in Lawrence.
- Tacoma has a higher median income of $79,085 compared to $59,834 in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Tacoma at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in Lawrence.
- The poverty level is higher in Lawrence at 12%, compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- The unemployment rate in Tacoma is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.9% in Lawrence.
Demographics
Demographics Tacoma vs Lawrence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Tacoma | Lawrence |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 5 |
White | 53 | 71 |
Asian | 9 | 6 |
Hispanic | 12 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 9 |
American Indian | 2 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Tacoma vs Lawrence
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Tacoma at 11% compared to 5% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lawrence at 71% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- The Asian population is larger in Tacoma at 9% compared to 6% in Lawrence.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Tacoma at 12% compared to 7% in Lawrence.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Tacoma at 13% compared to 9% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tacoma and Lawrence at 2%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Tacoma | Lawrence |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 16.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 9.5% |
Depression | 26.2% | 22.3% |
Smoking | 15.4% | 14.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 19.6% |
Obesity | 34.6% | 32.8% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tacoma vs Lawrence
- More residents in Tacoma report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.5% in Lawrence.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tacoma at 26.2% compared to 22.3% in Lawrence.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tacoma at 15.4% compared to 14.8% in Lawrence.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lawrence at 19.6% compared to 16.2% in Tacoma.
- Obesity rates are higher in Tacoma at 34.6% compared to 32.8% in Lawrence.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tacoma at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Lawrence.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Tacoma | Lawrence |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (3,474) | 0.5% (466) |
High School Diploma | 14.2% (31,504) | 8.2% (7,882) |
Less than High School | 10.1% (22,501) | 4.0% (3,784) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.0% (50,913) | 31.1% (29,776) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tacoma vs Lawrence
- A higher percentage of residents in Tacoma have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.5% in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Tacoma hold a high school diploma at 14.2% compared to 8.2% in Lawrence.
- More residents in Tacoma have less than a high school education at 10.1% compared to 4.0% in Lawrence.
- In Lawrence, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 23.0% in Tacoma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.