Demographics details for Sylvania, GA vs Fort atkinson, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sylvania, GA vs Fort atkinson, WI.

Data Sylvania Fort atkinson
Population 2,602 12,412
Median Age 43.7 years 42.0 years
Median Income $36,682 $72,215
Married Families 33.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 18% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Sylvania vs Fort atkinson

  • The population in Fort atkinson is higher at 12,412, compared to 2,602 in Sylvania.
  • Residents in Sylvania have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 42.0 years in Fort atkinson.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher median income of $72,215, compared to $36,682 in Sylvania.
  • In Fort atkinson, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 33.0% in Sylvania.
  • Sylvania has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 9% in Fort atkinson.
  • The unemployment rate in Sylvania is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.

Demographics

Demographics Sylvania vs Fort atkinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sylvania Fort atkinson
Black 57 Data is updating
White 40 89
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 8
Two or More Races 2 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sylvania vs Fort atkinson

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sylvania at 57% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort atkinson at 89% compared to 40% in Sylvania.
  • Both Sylvania and Fort atkinson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 1% in Sylvania.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort atkinson at 3%, compared to 2% in Sylvania.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sylvania and Fort atkinson at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sylvania Fort atkinson
Mental Health Not Good 18.9% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 14.4% 10.2%
Depression 21.8% 23.6%
Smoking 21.8% 16.0%
Binge Drinking 13.6% 23.5%
Obesity 40.5% 34.0%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sylvania vs Fort atkinson

  • More residents in Sylvania report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fort atkinson at 23.6% versus 21.8% in Sylvania.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sylvania at 21.8% compared to 16.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 13.6% in Sylvania.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sylvania at 40.5% compared to 34.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sylvania at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort atkinson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sylvania Fort atkinson
No Schooling 0.3% (8) 1.3% (160)
High School Diploma 27.1% (704) 20.8% (2,578)
Less than High School 18.6% (485) 12.9% (1,595)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.4% (271) 19.6% (2,436)

Education Levels Comparison: Sylvania vs Fort atkinson

  • In Fort atkinson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.3% in Sylvania.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sylvania hold a high school diploma at 27.1% compared to 20.8% in Fort atkinson.
  • More residents in Sylvania have less than a high school education at 18.6% compared to 12.9% in Fort atkinson.
  • In Fort atkinson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 10.4% in Sylvania.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.