Demographics details for Sweetwater, TX vs San gabriel, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sweetwater, TX vs San gabriel, CA.
Data | Sweetwater | San gabriel |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,408 | 38,140 |
Median Age | 35.7 years | 44.3 years |
Median Income | $44,306 | $84,056 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Sweetwater vs San gabriel
- The population in San gabriel is higher at 38,140, compared to 10,408 in Sweetwater.
- The median age in San gabriel is higher at 44.3 years, compared to 35.7 years in Sweetwater.
- San gabriel has a higher median income of $84,056, compared to $44,306 in Sweetwater.
- In San gabriel, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 32.0% in Sweetwater.
- Sweetwater has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in San gabriel.
- The unemployment rate in Sweetwater is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.4% in San gabriel.
Demographics
Demographics Sweetwater vs San gabriel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sweetwater | San gabriel |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 1 |
White | 34 | 2 |
Asian | Data is updating | 61 |
Hispanic | 46 | 27 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 9 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sweetwater vs San gabriel
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sweetwater at 6% compared to 1% in San gabriel.
- Sweetwater has a higher percentage of White residents at 34% compared to 2% in San gabriel.
- In San gabriel, the Asian population stands at 61%, greater than 0% in Sweetwater.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sweetwater at 46% compared to 27% in San gabriel.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sweetwater at 13% compared to 9% in San gabriel.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sweetwater at 1% compared to 0% in San gabriel.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sweetwater | San gabriel |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 13.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 9.9% |
Depression | 24.2% | 11.9% |
Smoking | 20.3% | 11.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 11.2% |
Obesity | 38.9% | 20.4% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sweetwater vs San gabriel
- More residents in Sweetwater report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 13.5% in San gabriel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sweetwater at 24.2% compared to 11.9% in San gabriel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sweetwater at 20.3% compared to 11.0% in San gabriel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sweetwater at 17.3% compared to 11.2% in San gabriel.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sweetwater at 38.9% compared to 20.4% in San gabriel.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sweetwater at 21.0% compared to 8.0% in San gabriel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sweetwater | San gabriel |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.9% (194) | 7.6% (2,889) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (1,666) | 16.2% (6,193) |
Less than High School | 23.1% (2,408) | 21.7% (8,295) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (733) | 26.8% (10,230) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sweetwater vs San gabriel
- In San gabriel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 7.6% compared to 1.9% in Sweetwater.
- In San gabriel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 16.0% in Sweetwater.
- More residents in Sweetwater have less than a high school education at 23.1% compared to 21.7% in San gabriel.
- In San gabriel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.8% compared to 7.0% in Sweetwater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.