Demographics details for Sweetwater, TX vs Caruthersville, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sweetwater, TX vs Caruthersville, MO.

Data Sweetwater Caruthersville
Population 10,408 5,295
Median Age 35.7 years 36.8 years
Median Income $44,306 $35,585
Married Families 32.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 15% 20%
Unemployment Rate 5.4 5.6

Population Comparison: Sweetwater vs Caruthersville

  • In Sweetwater, the population is higher at 10,408, compared to 5,295 in Caruthersville.
  • The median age in Caruthersville is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 35.7 years in Sweetwater.
  • Sweetwater has a higher median income of $44,306 compared to $35,585 in Caruthersville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sweetwater at 32.0% compared to 26.0% in Caruthersville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Caruthersville at 20%, compared to 15% in Sweetwater.
  • Caruthersville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 5.4% in Sweetwater.

Demographics

Demographics Sweetwater vs Caruthersville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sweetwater Caruthersville
Black 6 40
White 34 52
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 46 5
Two or More Races 13 3
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sweetwater vs Caruthersville

  • In Caruthersville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 6% in Sweetwater.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Caruthersville at 52% compared to 34% in Sweetwater.
  • Both Sweetwater and Caruthersville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sweetwater at 46% compared to 5% in Caruthersville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sweetwater at 13% compared to 3% in Caruthersville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sweetwater at 1% compared to 0% in Caruthersville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sweetwater Caruthersville
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 14.3% 17.0%
Depression 24.2% 25.6%
Smoking 20.3% 28.4%
Binge Drinking 17.3% 14.6%
Obesity 38.9% 44.0%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 27.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sweetwater vs Caruthersville

  • In Caruthersville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 19.1% in Sweetwater.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Caruthersville at 25.6% versus 24.2% in Sweetwater.
  • Caruthersville has a higher smoking rate at 28.4% compared to 20.3% in Sweetwater.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sweetwater at 17.3% compared to 14.6% in Caruthersville.
  • Caruthersville has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 38.9% in Sweetwater.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Caruthersville at 27.0% compared to 21.0% in Sweetwater.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sweetwater Caruthersville
No Schooling 1.9% (194) 0.8% (42)
High School Diploma 16.0% (1,666) 23.6% (1,249)
Less than High School 23.1% (2,408) 23.0% (1,217)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.0% (733) 9.1% (484)

Education Levels Comparison: Sweetwater vs Caruthersville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sweetwater have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.8% in Caruthersville.
  • In Caruthersville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.6% compared to 16.0% in Sweetwater.
  • More residents in Sweetwater have less than a high school education at 23.1% compared to 23.0% in Caruthersville.
  • In Caruthersville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.1% compared to 7.0% in Sweetwater.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.