Demographics details for Sweetwater, TN vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sweetwater, TN vs Loves park, IL.
| Data | Sweetwater | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,451 | 23,365 |
| Median Age | 43.7 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $38,750 | $56,370 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Sweetwater vs Loves park
- The population in Loves park is higher at 23,365, compared to 6,451 in Sweetwater.
- Residents in Sweetwater have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher median income of $56,370, compared to $38,750 in Sweetwater.
- In Loves park, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 33.0% in Sweetwater.
- Sweetwater has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 9% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.4% in Sweetwater.
Demographics
Demographics Sweetwater vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sweetwater | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 7 |
| White | 86 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sweetwater vs Loves park
- In Loves park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 5% in Sweetwater.
- Sweetwater has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 71% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Sweetwater.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 5% in Sweetwater.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 4% in Sweetwater.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sweetwater and Loves park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sweetwater | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.0% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 29.3% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 25.3% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sweetwater vs Loves park
- More residents in Sweetwater report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sweetwater at 29.3% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sweetwater at 25.3% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 14.9% in Sweetwater.
- Loves park has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 35.7% in Sweetwater.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sweetwater at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Loves park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sweetwater | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (29) | 0.4% (97) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (1,606) | 17.1% (3,994) |
| Less than High School | 16.4% (1,056) | 9.7% (2,262) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.2% (720) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sweetwater vs Loves park
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sweetwater and Loves park at 0.4%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sweetwater hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 17.1% in Loves park.
- More residents in Sweetwater have less than a high school education at 16.4% compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 11.2% in Sweetwater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.