Demographics details for Summerville, SC vs Forest lake, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Summerville, SC vs Forest lake, MN.
Data | Summerville | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
Population | 51,617 | 20,857 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $73,712 | $91,157 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Summerville vs Forest lake
- In Summerville, the population is higher at 51,617, compared to 20,857 in Forest lake.
- Residents in Summerville have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 37.9 years in Forest lake.
- Forest lake has a higher median income of $91,157, compared to $73,712 in Summerville.
- In Forest lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 40.0% in Summerville.
- Summerville has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- The unemployment rate in Summerville is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.
Demographics
Demographics Summerville vs Forest lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Summerville | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
Black | 20 | 3 |
White | 67 | 81 |
Asian | 2 | 4 |
Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Summerville vs Forest lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Summerville at 20% compared to 3% in Forest lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Forest lake at 81% compared to 67% in Summerville.
- In Forest lake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Summerville.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Summerville and Forest lake at 6%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forest lake at 6%, compared to 5% in Summerville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Summerville and Forest lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Summerville | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 14.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 8.8% |
Depression | 21.6% | 24.1% |
Smoking | 17.4% | 15.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 21.4% |
Obesity | 40.3% | 32.9% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Summerville vs Forest lake
- More residents in Summerville report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 14.7% in Forest lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Forest lake at 24.1% versus 21.6% in Summerville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Summerville at 17.4% compared to 15.7% in Forest lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 17.9% in Summerville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Summerville at 40.3% compared to 32.9% in Forest lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Summerville at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Forest lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Summerville | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (406) | 0.5% (101) |
High School Diploma | 14.6% (7,519) | 14.6% (3,055) |
Less than High School | 7.1% (3,663) | 7.7% (1,615) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.1% (10,871) | 24.6% (5,123) |
Education Levels Comparison: Summerville vs Forest lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Summerville have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Forest lake.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 14.6%.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest lake at 7.7%, compared to 7.1% in Summerville.
- In Forest lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 21.1% in Summerville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.