Demographics details for Sulphur, OK vs Mcminnville, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur, OK vs Mcminnville, OR.
| Data | Sulphur | Mcminnville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,951 | 34,530 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 40.1 years |
| Median Income | $55,951 | $65,318 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur vs Mcminnville
- The population in Mcminnville is higher at 34,530, compared to 4,951 in Sulphur.
- The median age in Mcminnville is higher at 40.1 years, compared to 38.8 years in Sulphur.
- Mcminnville has a higher median income of $65,318, compared to $55,951 in Sulphur.
- In Mcminnville, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Mcminnville.
- Mcminnville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Sulphur.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur vs Mcminnville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sulphur | Mcminnville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 60 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 12 |
| American Indian | 10 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur vs Mcminnville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sulphur at 2% compared to 0% in Mcminnville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mcminnville at 67% compared to 60% in Sulphur.
- In Mcminnville, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Sulphur.
- Mcminnville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 12% in Sulphur.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sulphur at 16% compared to 12% in Mcminnville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sulphur at 10% compared to 1% in Mcminnville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sulphur | Mcminnville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 27.2% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 35.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur vs Mcminnville
- More residents in Sulphur report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.3% in Mcminnville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mcminnville at 27.2% versus 25.3% in Sulphur.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur at 21.4% compared to 15.6% in Mcminnville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mcminnville at 17.6% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur at 40.7% compared to 35.1% in Mcminnville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Mcminnville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sulphur | Mcminnville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (88) | 1.4% (472) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (899) | 11.9% (4,114) |
| Less than High School | 18.1% (898) | 16.8% (5,808) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (542) | 17.7% (6,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur vs Mcminnville
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.4% in Mcminnville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 11.9% in Mcminnville.
- More residents in Sulphur have less than a high school education at 18.1% compared to 16.8% in Mcminnville.
- In Mcminnville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 10.9% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.