Demographics details for Sulphur springs, TX vs Elizabeth, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur springs, TX vs Elizabeth, NJ.

Data Sulphur springs Elizabeth
Population 16,408 134,283
Median Age 39.4 years 35.7 years
Median Income $54,950 $59,939
Married Families 39.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 15% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.9

Population Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Elizabeth

  • The population in Elizabeth is higher at 134,283, compared to 16,408 in Sulphur springs.
  • Residents in Sulphur springs have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 35.7 years in Elizabeth.
  • Elizabeth has a higher median income of $59,939, compared to $54,950 in Sulphur springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sulphur springs at 39.0% compared to 30.0% in Elizabeth.
  • Sulphur springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Elizabeth.
  • Elizabeth has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 4.5% in Sulphur springs.

Demographics

Demographics Sulphur springs vs Elizabeth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sulphur springs Elizabeth
Black 14 18
White 63 11
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 17 66
Two or More Races 5 14
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Elizabeth

  • In Elizabeth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 14% in Sulphur springs.
  • Sulphur springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 11% in Elizabeth.
  • In Elizabeth, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Sulphur springs.
  • Elizabeth has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 66%, compared to 17% in Sulphur springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Elizabeth at 14%, compared to 5% in Sulphur springs.
  • In Elizabeth, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sulphur springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sulphur springs Elizabeth
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 14.5%
Depression 24.8% 18.0%
Smoking 20.1% 17.7%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 15.0%
Obesity 39.5% 33.9%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Elizabeth

  • More residents in Sulphur springs report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.8% in Elizabeth.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur springs at 24.8% compared to 18.0% in Elizabeth.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur springs at 20.1% compared to 17.7% in Elizabeth.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sulphur springs at 17.5% compared to 15.0% in Elizabeth.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur springs at 39.5% compared to 33.9% in Elizabeth.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sulphur springs at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Elizabeth.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sulphur springs Elizabeth
No Schooling 0.8% (127) 2.6% (3,513)
High School Diploma 18.3% (3,003) 23.7% (31,770)
Less than High School 16.0% (2,628) 31.8% (42,757)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.7% (2,248) 9.2% (12,394)

Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Elizabeth

  • In Elizabeth, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.8% in Sulphur springs.
  • In Elizabeth, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.7% compared to 18.3% in Sulphur springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Elizabeth at 31.8%, compared to 16.0% in Sulphur springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 9.2% in Elizabeth.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.