Demographics details for Sulphur springs, TX vs Ada, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur springs, TX vs Ada, OK.
Data | Sulphur springs | Ada |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,408 | 16,542 |
Median Age | 39.4 years | 32.4 years |
Median Income | $54,950 | $47,264 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Ada
- The population in Ada is higher at 16,542, compared to 16,408 in Sulphur springs.
- Residents in Sulphur springs have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 32.4 years in Ada.
- Sulphur springs has a higher median income of $54,950 compared to $47,264 in Ada.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sulphur springs at 39.0% compared to 28.0% in Ada.
- Sulphur springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Ada.
- The unemployment rate in Sulphur springs is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.7% in Ada.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur springs vs Ada provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sulphur springs | Ada |
---|---|---|
Black | 14 | 5 |
White | 63 | 55 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 17 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 14 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 18 |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Ada
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sulphur springs at 14% compared to 5% in Ada.
- Sulphur springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 55% in Ada.
- In Ada, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Sulphur springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sulphur springs at 17% compared to 6% in Ada.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ada at 14%, compared to 5% in Sulphur springs.
- In Ada, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 18%, compared to 0% in Sulphur springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sulphur springs | Ada |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.3% |
Depression | 24.8% | 26.3% |
Smoking | 20.1% | 21.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 37.3% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Ada
- In Ada, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 19.1% in Sulphur springs.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ada at 26.3% versus 24.8% in Sulphur springs.
- Ada has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 20.1% in Sulphur springs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sulphur springs at 17.5% compared to 13.8% in Ada.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur springs at 39.5% compared to 37.3% in Ada.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ada at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Sulphur springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sulphur springs | Ada |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (127) | 0.5% (89) |
High School Diploma | 18.3% (3,003) | 15.2% (2,519) |
Less than High School | 16.0% (2,628) | 12.5% (2,071) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (2,248) | 17.8% (2,952) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Ada
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur springs have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Ada.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur springs hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 15.2% in Ada.
- More residents in Sulphur springs have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 12.5% in Ada.
- In Ada, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.8% compared to 13.7% in Sulphur springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.