Demographics details for Sullivan city, TX vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sullivan city, TX vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | Sullivan city | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,903 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $39,067 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Sullivan city vs Fairburn
- The population in Fairburn is higher at 16,956, compared to 3,903 in Sullivan city.
- Residents in Sullivan city have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245, compared to $39,067 in Sullivan city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sullivan city at 38.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- Sullivan city has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 15% in Fairburn.
- The unemployment rate in Sullivan city is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Fairburn.
Demographics
Demographics Sullivan city vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sullivan city | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 73 |
| White | -35 | 12 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 100 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 35 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sullivan city vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 0% in Sullivan city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairburn at 12% compared to -35% in Sullivan city.
- Both Sullivan city and Fairburn have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sullivan city at 100% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sullivan city at 35% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sullivan city and Fairburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sullivan city | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.3% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 22.3% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 21.9% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 24.0% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 51.2% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sullivan city vs Fairburn
- More residents in Sullivan city report poor mental health at 22.3% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sullivan city at 21.9% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sullivan city at 24.0% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairburn at 15.0% compared to 13.7% in Sullivan city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sullivan city at 51.2% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sullivan city at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sullivan city | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (101) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 9.2% (361) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 61.1% (2,384) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.6% (180) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sullivan city vs Fairburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Sullivan city have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- In Fairburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 9.2% in Sullivan city.
- More residents in Sullivan city have less than a high school education at 61.1% compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- In Fairburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 4.6% in Sullivan city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.