Demographics details for Suffolk, VA vs Rockford, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Suffolk, VA vs Rockford, IL.
| Data | Suffolk | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 98,537 | 146,713 |
| Median Age | 38.5 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $87,758 | $50,744 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 7.6 |
Population Comparison: Suffolk vs Rockford
- The population in Rockford is higher at 146,713, compared to 98,537 in Suffolk.
- Residents in Suffolk have a higher median age of 38.5 years compared to 37.5 years in Rockford.
- Suffolk has a higher median income of $87,758 compared to $50,744 in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Suffolk at 40.0% compared to 32.0% in Rockford.
- The poverty level is higher in Rockford at 20%, compared to 7% in Suffolk.
- Rockford has a higher unemployment rate at 7.6% compared to 3.2% in Suffolk.
Demographics
Demographics Suffolk vs Rockford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Suffolk | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 40 | 22 |
| White | 47 | 46 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Suffolk vs Rockford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Suffolk at 40% compared to 22% in Rockford.
- Suffolk has a higher percentage of White residents at 47% compared to 46% in Rockford.
- In Rockford, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Suffolk.
- Rockford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 5% in Suffolk.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rockford at 9%, compared to 6% in Suffolk.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Suffolk and Rockford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Suffolk | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 21.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 42.4% | 44.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Suffolk vs Rockford
- In Rockford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.6% in Suffolk.
- Depression is more prevalent in Suffolk at 21.4% compared to 21.0% in Rockford.
- Rockford has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 15.3% in Suffolk.
- Binge drinking is more common in Suffolk at 16.6% compared to 14.8% in Rockford.
- Rockford has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 42.4% in Suffolk.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rockford at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Suffolk.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Suffolk | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (965) | 1.2% (1,781) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (14,643) | 16.4% (24,126) |
| Less than High School | 7.8% (7,701) | 17.1% (25,088) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (20,740) | 15.5% (22,792) |
Education Levels Comparison: Suffolk vs Rockford
- In Rockford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Suffolk.
- In Rockford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.4% compared to 14.9% in Suffolk.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rockford at 17.1%, compared to 7.8% in Suffolk.
- A higher percentage of residents in Suffolk hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 15.5% in Rockford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.