Demographics details for Sublette, KS vs Lexington, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sublette, KS vs Lexington, NE.
| Data | Sublette | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,333 | 10,725 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 30.0 years |
| Median Income | $66,354 | $63,939 |
| Married Families | 55.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sublette vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 10,725, compared to 1,333 in Sublette.
- Residents in Sublette have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 30.0 years in Lexington.
- Sublette has a higher median income of $66,354 compared to $63,939 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sublette at 55.0% compared to 35.0% in Lexington.
- Sublette has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Lexington.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Sublette and Lexington at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Sublette vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sublette | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 15 |
| White | 47 | 4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 36 | 64 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 15 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sublette vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Sublette.
- Sublette has a higher percentage of White residents at 47% compared to 4% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Sublette.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 36% in Sublette.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 14% in Sublette.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sublette at 3% compared to 1% in Lexington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sublette | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 13.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 16.2% |
| Smoking | 20.2% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 40.6% | 45.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sublette vs Lexington
- More residents in Sublette report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sublette at 21.8% compared to 16.2% in Lexington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sublette at 20.2% compared to 18.6% in Lexington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lexington at 18.1% compared to 17.8% in Sublette.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 45.1% compared to 40.6% in Sublette.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sublette at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sublette | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.5% (47) | 6.2% (660) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (217) | 13.6% (1,463) |
| Less than High School | 25.7% (343) | 36.3% (3,892) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (150) | 7.3% (779) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sublette vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 3.5% in Sublette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sublette hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 36.3%, compared to 25.7% in Sublette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sublette hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 7.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.