Demographics details for Sterling, IL vs Jackson, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sterling, IL vs Jackson, MI.
| Data | Sterling | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,566 | 31,031 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $49,007 | $41,988 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 7.9 |
Population Comparison: Sterling vs Jackson
- The population in Jackson is higher at 31,031, compared to 14,566 in Sterling.
- Residents in Sterling have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 35.0 years in Jackson.
- Sterling has a higher median income of $49,007 compared to $41,988 in Jackson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling at 32.0% compared to 27.0% in Jackson.
- The poverty level is higher in Jackson at 21%, compared to 12% in Sterling.
- Jackson has a higher unemployment rate at 7.9% compared to 4.2% in Sterling.
Demographics
Demographics Sterling vs Jackson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sterling | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 21 |
| White | 56 | 62 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sterling vs Jackson
- In Jackson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 2% in Sterling.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jackson at 62% compared to 56% in Sterling.
- The Asian population is larger in Sterling at 2% compared to 1% in Jackson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sterling at 27% compared to 6% in Jackson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sterling at 12% compared to 10% in Jackson.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sterling at 1% compared to 0% in Jackson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sterling | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 15.0% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 26.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 41.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling vs Jackson
- In Jackson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.7% in Sterling.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jackson at 27.0% versus 22.2% in Sterling.
- Jackson has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 18.6% in Sterling.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sterling at 17.4% compared to 14.9% in Jackson.
- Jackson has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 39.5% in Sterling.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sterling at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Jackson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sterling | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (164) | 0.5% (166) |
| High School Diploma | 24.1% (3,511) | 21.1% (6,548) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (2,012) | 14.2% (4,397) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (1,713) | 10.1% (3,126) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sterling vs Jackson
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.5% in Jackson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling hold a high school diploma at 24.1% compared to 21.1% in Jackson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jackson at 14.2%, compared to 13.8% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sterling hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 10.1% in Jackson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.