Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Desoto, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Desoto, TX.

Data Sterling heights Desoto
Population 132,567 55,968
Median Age 41.2 years 41.1 years
Median Income $75,381 $81,736
Married Families 45.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 8% 7%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 5.8

Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Desoto

  • In Sterling heights, the population is higher at 132,567, compared to 55,968 in Desoto.
  • Residents in Sterling heights have a higher median age of 41.2 years compared to 41.1 years in Desoto.
  • Desoto has a higher median income of $81,736, compared to $75,381 in Sterling heights.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling heights at 45.0% compared to 34.0% in Desoto.
  • Sterling heights has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 7% in Desoto.
  • Desoto has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.7% in Sterling heights.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling heights vs Desoto provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling heights Desoto
Black 6 67
White 79 6
Asian 9 1
Hispanic 2 18
Two or More Races 4 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Desoto

  • In Desoto, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 67% compared to 6% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 6% in Desoto.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sterling heights at 9% compared to 1% in Desoto.
  • Desoto has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Desoto at 8%, compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sterling heights and Desoto at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling heights Desoto
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 16.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 10.7%
Depression 25.5% 19.7%
Smoking 19.8% 15.3%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 17.0%
Obesity 36.6% 37.9%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Desoto

  • More residents in Sterling heights report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.3% in Desoto.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 25.5% compared to 19.7% in Desoto.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 19.8% compared to 15.3% in Desoto.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 17.0% in Desoto.
  • Desoto has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Desoto.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling heights Desoto
No Schooling 2.4% (3,134) 0.3% (181)
High School Diploma 18.8% (24,937) 14.6% (8,179)
Less than High School 16.6% (22,008) 8.4% (4,718)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (29,518) 20.5% (11,468)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Desoto

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.3% in Desoto.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 14.6% in Desoto.
  • More residents in Sterling heights have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 8.4% in Desoto.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 20.5% in Desoto.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.