Demographics details for Starrucca, PA vs Waterford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Starrucca, PA vs Waterford, CT.
Data | Starrucca | Waterford |
---|---|---|
Population | 173 | 3,276 |
Median Age | 48.1 years | 45.2 years |
Median Income | $62,788 | $74,701 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Starrucca vs Waterford
- The population in Waterford is higher at 3,276, compared to 173 in Starrucca.
- Residents in Starrucca have a higher median age of 48.1 years compared to 45.2 years in Waterford.
- Waterford has a higher median income of $74,701, compared to $62,788 in Starrucca.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Starrucca at 39.0% compared to 34.0% in Waterford.
- Starrucca has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Waterford.
- Waterford has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Starrucca.
Demographics
Demographics Starrucca vs Waterford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Starrucca | Waterford |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 4 |
White | 99 | 80 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Starrucca vs Waterford
- In Waterford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Starrucca.
- Starrucca has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 80% in Waterford.
- In Waterford, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Starrucca.
- Waterford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Starrucca.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waterford at 6%, compared to 1% in Starrucca.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Starrucca and Waterford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Starrucca | Waterford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 10.4% |
Depression | 22.3% | 24.0% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 17.5% |
Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 33.5% | 32.3% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Starrucca vs Waterford
- In Waterford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.6% in Starrucca.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waterford at 24.0% versus 22.3% in Starrucca.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Starrucca at 19.9% compared to 17.5% in Waterford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Starrucca at 19.6% compared to 17.2% in Waterford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Starrucca at 33.5% compared to 32.3% in Waterford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waterford at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Starrucca.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Starrucca | Waterford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (2) | 0.5% (17) |
High School Diploma | 33.5% (58) | 22.6% (739) |
Less than High School | 15.0% (26) | 5.9% (193) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (35) | 17.8% (582) |
Education Levels Comparison: Starrucca vs Waterford
- A higher percentage of residents in Starrucca have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Waterford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Starrucca hold a high school diploma at 33.5% compared to 22.6% in Waterford.
- More residents in Starrucca have less than a high school education at 15.0% compared to 5.9% in Waterford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Starrucca hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 17.8% in Waterford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.