Demographics details for Stanford, IL vs Riverhead, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stanford, IL vs Riverhead, NY.
Data | Stanford | Riverhead |
---|---|---|
Population | 592 | 33,539 |
Median Age | 30.9 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $80,417 | $80,000 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 60.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Stanford vs Riverhead
- The population in Riverhead is higher at 33,539, compared to 592 in Stanford.
- The median age in Riverhead is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 30.9 years in Stanford.
- Stanford has a higher median income of $80,417 compared to $80,000 in Riverhead.
- In Riverhead, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 32.0% in Stanford.
- Stanford has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 7% in Riverhead.
- The unemployment rate in Stanford is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.3% in Riverhead.
Demographics
Demographics Stanford vs Riverhead provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Stanford | Riverhead |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 10 |
White | 93 | 70 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 2 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stanford vs Riverhead
- In Riverhead, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Stanford.
- Stanford has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 70% in Riverhead.
- In Riverhead, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Stanford.
- Riverhead has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 2% in Stanford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Stanford at 5% compared to 0% in Riverhead.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stanford and Riverhead at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Stanford | Riverhead |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 21.9% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 15.7% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 18.8% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 35.6% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stanford vs Riverhead
- More residents in Stanford report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stanford at 21.9% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stanford at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stanford at 18.8% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stanford at 35.6% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stanford at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Stanford | Riverhead |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 19.3% (114) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 5.7% (34) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (43) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stanford vs Riverhead
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Stanford and Riverhead at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stanford hold a high school diploma at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
- More residents in Stanford have less than a high school education at 5.7% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stanford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Riverhead.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.