Demographics details for Stamford, CT vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stamford, CT vs South jordan, UT.
Data | Stamford | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Population | 136,188 | 83,513 |
Median Age | 37.6 years | 34.4 years |
Median Income | $100,718 | $119,822 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Stamford vs South jordan
- In Stamford, the population is higher at 136,188, compared to 83,513 in South jordan.
- Residents in Stamford have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $100,718 in Stamford.
- In South jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 38.0% in Stamford.
- Stamford has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 2.6% in Stamford.
Demographics
Demographics Stamford vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Stamford | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Black | 19 | Data is updating |
White | 33 | 83 |
Asian | 7 | 4 |
Hispanic | 30 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Stamford vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stamford at 19% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South jordan at 83% compared to 33% in Stamford.
- The Asian population is larger in Stamford at 7% compared to 4% in South jordan.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Stamford at 30% compared to 7% in South jordan.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Stamford at 11% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Stamford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Stamford | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 9.0% |
Depression | 17.1% | 26.5% |
Smoking | 11.2% | 7.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 25.1% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stamford vs South jordan
- In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 13.4% in Stamford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 17.1% in Stamford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stamford at 11.2% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in South jordan at 16.9% compared to 16.1% in Stamford.
- South jordan has higher obesity rates at 28.6% compared to 25.1% in Stamford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stamford at 8.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Stamford | South jordan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (2,214) | 0.2% (172) |
High School Diploma | 12.0% (16,291) | 8.4% (6,995) |
Less than High School | 15.0% (20,422) | 2.7% (2,236) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.7% (48,639) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stamford vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of residents in Stamford have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stamford hold a high school diploma at 12.0% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- More residents in Stamford have less than a high school education at 15.0% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stamford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 27.1% in South jordan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.