Demographics details for Stafford springs, CT vs Stow, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stafford springs, CT vs Stow, OH.
| Data | Stafford springs | Stow |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,890 | 34,216 |
| Median Age | 43.3 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $68,929 | $89,805 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Stafford springs vs Stow
- The population in Stow is higher at 34,216, compared to 4,890 in Stafford springs.
- Residents in Stafford springs have a higher median age of 43.3 years compared to 39.7 years in Stow.
- Stow has a higher median income of $89,805, compared to $68,929 in Stafford springs.
- In Stow, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 34.0% in Stafford springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Stow at 8%, compared to 7% in Stafford springs.
- Stow has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.2% in Stafford springs.
Demographics
Demographics Stafford springs vs Stow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stafford springs | Stow |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 86 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stafford springs vs Stow
- In Stow, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Stafford springs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stow at 89% compared to 86% in Stafford springs.
- In Stow, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Stafford springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Stafford springs at 8% compared to 1% in Stow.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Stafford springs at 6% compared to 4% in Stow.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stafford springs and Stow at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stafford springs | Stow |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 30.2% | 38.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stafford springs vs Stow
- More residents in Stafford springs report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.4% in Stow.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stafford springs at 24.2% compared to 23.6% in Stow.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stafford springs at 16.1% compared to 14.8% in Stow.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Stow at 19.5% compared to 17.0% in Stafford springs.
- Stow has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 30.2% in Stafford springs.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stafford springs at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Stow.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stafford springs | Stow |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (19) | 0.6% (208) |
| High School Diploma | 25.8% (1,262) | 14.9% (5,110) |
| Less than High School | 9.3% (454) | 3.7% (1,256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (795) | 33.7% (11,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stafford springs vs Stow
- In Stow, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Stafford springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stafford springs hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 14.9% in Stow.
- More residents in Stafford springs have less than a high school education at 9.3% compared to 3.7% in Stow.
- In Stow, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.7% compared to 16.3% in Stafford springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.