Demographics details for Stafford springs, CT vs Charlotte, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Stafford springs, CT vs Charlotte, NC.

Data Stafford springs Charlotte
Population 4,890 897,720
Median Age 43.3 years 34.5 years
Median Income $68,929 $74,070
Married Families 34.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 7% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.0

Population Comparison: Stafford springs vs Charlotte

  • The population in Charlotte is higher at 897,720, compared to 4,890 in Stafford springs.
  • Residents in Stafford springs have a higher median age of 43.3 years compared to 34.5 years in Charlotte.
  • Charlotte has a higher median income of $74,070, compared to $68,929 in Stafford springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Stafford springs at 34.0% compared to 33.0% in Charlotte.
  • The poverty level is higher in Charlotte at 12%, compared to 7% in Stafford springs.
  • The unemployment rate in Stafford springs is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.0% in Charlotte.

Demographics

Demographics Stafford springs vs Charlotte provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Stafford springs Charlotte
Black Data is updating 34
White 86 38
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic 8 15
Two or More Races 6 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Stafford springs vs Charlotte

  • In Charlotte, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 0% in Stafford springs.
  • Stafford springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 38% in Charlotte.
  • In Charlotte, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Stafford springs.
  • Charlotte has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 8% in Stafford springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Charlotte at 7%, compared to 6% in Stafford springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stafford springs and Charlotte at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Stafford springs Charlotte
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 14.7%
Physical Health Not Good 9.7% 10.1%
Depression 24.2% 20.1%
Smoking 16.1% 13.9%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 17.5%
Obesity 30.2% 34.7%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Stafford springs vs Charlotte

  • More residents in Stafford springs report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 14.7% in Charlotte.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Stafford springs at 24.2% compared to 20.1% in Charlotte.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Stafford springs at 16.1% compared to 13.9% in Charlotte.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Charlotte at 17.5% compared to 17.0% in Stafford springs.
  • Charlotte has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 30.2% in Stafford springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Stafford springs at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Charlotte.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Stafford springs Charlotte
No Schooling 0.4% (19) 1.2% (10,429)
High School Diploma 25.8% (1,262) 9.4% (84,002)
Less than High School 9.3% (454) 10.7% (95,990)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.3% (795) 30.6% (274,311)

Education Levels Comparison: Stafford springs vs Charlotte

  • In Charlotte, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Stafford springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Stafford springs hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 9.4% in Charlotte.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Charlotte at 10.7%, compared to 9.3% in Stafford springs.
  • In Charlotte, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.6% compared to 16.3% in Stafford springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.