Demographics details for Springfield, GA vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springfield, GA vs Loves park, IL.
Data | Springfield | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,942 | 23,365 |
Median Age | 32.8 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $46,936 | $56,370 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Springfield vs Loves park
- The population in Loves park is higher at 23,365, compared to 2,942 in Springfield.
- The median age in Loves park is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 32.8 years in Springfield.
- Loves park has a higher median income of $56,370, compared to $46,936 in Springfield.
- In Loves park, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Springfield.
- Springfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Loves park.
- The unemployment rate in Springfield is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Springfield vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Springfield | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | 7 |
White | 73 | 71 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 1 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Springfield vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Springfield at 21% compared to 7% in Loves park.
- Springfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 71% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Springfield.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 1% in Springfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 5% in Springfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Springfield and Loves park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Springfield | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 11.3% |
Depression | 19.2% | 21.3% |
Smoking | 18.1% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 39.9% | 39.4% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springfield vs Loves park
- In Loves park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 16.1% in Springfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Loves park at 21.3% versus 19.2% in Springfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Springfield at 18.1% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 16.1% in Springfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Springfield at 39.9% compared to 39.4% in Loves park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Springfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Springfield | Loves park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (18) | 0.4% (97) |
High School Diploma | 20.2% (594) | 17.1% (3,994) |
Less than High School | 10.8% (317) | 9.7% (2,262) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.3% (391) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springfield vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Springfield have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springfield hold a high school diploma at 20.2% compared to 17.1% in Loves park.
- More residents in Springfield have less than a high school education at 10.8% compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 13.3% in Springfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.